Would you like to make this site your homepage? It's fast and easy...
Yes, Please make this my home page!
Enter Stage Right
http://www.enterstageright.com/0600sexed.htm
Fallout from Sex Education: 1965-2000
By Charles A. Morse
web posted June 19, 2000
Sex Education has nothing to do with education and everything to do with
sex. The stated purpose of introducing sex to children is to corrupt the
morality of minors and to undermine the moral authority of the family.
This stealthily marketed, perverse agenda is cloaked in high-minded
"science" as smarmy looking "experts" conduct their teaching with
studied
tones and gestures. Their tender ministrations, paid for with our tax
money, are morally and objectively bankrupt when looked at with
conventional eyes. However, when we perceive the agenda and intent of the
sex curriculum, we discover that, from their perspective, Sex Ed has been
a smashing success.
The philosophy of Sex Ed, in simple terms, is the sexualizing of children
as a means of depriving them of their innocence and thus turning them into
quasi adults before their time. The goal of such psychological debauchery
is to replace the father-dominated family with the state, thus effecting a
"transformation" of the child into a damaged and perpetually dependant
"human resource". The semi-enslaved youth is than more easily channeled
into a function that serves the state. Essentially, the youth is
psychologically and spiritually lobotomized.
Philip Rieff, chief consultant to the leftist National Council of
Churches, 1961-1964, wrote "The Triumph of the Therapeutic-Uses of Faith
after Freud" which succinctly illustrates the sex education agenda. He
writes (pp159) "Sex education becomes the main weapon in an ideological
war against the family; its aim was to divest the parents of their moral
authority". A demoralized society is more malleable to the blandishments
of those who tend toward utopian fantasies of absolute power. They have,
for the most part, failed in this country, however the cost has been
devastating. While sex Ed accounts for only one spoke in the wheel, Lets
look at the facts.
The following information comes from the Dept. of Health and Human
Services, the Center for Disease Control and the Alan Guttmacher
Institute. Since the introduction of Sex Ed, 1965, teenage pregnancies
have increased over 400 per cent and by 1988, out of wedlock births to
teens had increased 69 per cent. Each day, 2 756 teens become pregnant
with 1 340 babies born. Of girls between 15 and 19, 10 per cent get
pregnant each year and currently, 80 per cent are unmarried. The sex
Educator sneers at abstinence education. They argue that, along with the
"patriarchal" family, such ideas have been swept away by the inevitable
forces of history. Abortion is looked on as a solution to the situation
they contributed to and not surprisingly, they ally themselves with that
industry.
Sexually transmitted diseases are up since 1965. Gonorrhea is up 400 per
cent among students age 10-14. As many as 40 per cent of sexually active
teenage girls may be infected with STDs. Each year 4 000 students become
infected with syphilis, AIDS has increased 62 per cent since 1990, and the
number of teens with AIDS is doubling every 14 months. The long term
effects of these diseases, particularly those that are increasingly
resistant to antibiotics, is not known, however, a chronically ill
population, as it ages, will more likely be in favor of a more communized
form of health care. The spread of AIDS, particularly among young people,
could have dire consequences for the human species as a whole.
Pre-marital sex among 15 year olds is up almost 1 000 per cent and
two-thirds of America's teenage boys say they have had sex by age 18 with
an average of 5 girls. Rape arrests among teenagers is up 30 per cent,
aggravated assault arrests up 2 000 per cent, and murder is up 120 per
cent. Other concomitant factors and consequences include massive increases
in drug use, exposure to pornography, suicide, and runaway children
pressed into prostitution both female and male. While these social ills
are not solely the responsibility of Sex Ed, the educators should play the
role of protectors, in loco parentis, from the ugly side of life. Instead,
they are on the vanguard of its advocacy.
The Sex Ed agenda is to "transform" our children before we, as parents
have a chance to instill values. They consider sexual restraint to be
"repressive" and therefore psychologically damaging. When it comes to sex,
anything goes and the more the merrier. A parent suggesting otherwise is
seen as "counterproductive" and even "discriminatory". We are paying
for
the destruction of our children's wellbeing and even possibly, their life.
We are allowing the moral consensus upon which this Republic was founded
to be ripped to shreds and replaced by a society so sex obsessed that it
will be too distracted to observe the erosion of freedom.
----------------------
Chuck Morse is a syndicated talk show host on the American Freedom
Network and a contributing writer to Enter Stage Right and Etherzone.
